
The Fountainhead: <Click on title to buy from Amazon
A beautiful unique book with pulp philosophy?

When I read this I was not more than 24 and it caused the storms in my mind! I believe it was the during Christmas holidays of 2003. It has this ability to do this to you on your first reading. About 3 years later when I revisited it, it sounded a bit sophomoric in some places but still a great story even if you do not agree with the philosophy. Everyone is going to have mixed feelings for this novel. And you might change your opinions about it with time. So, I am offering two review. First short one was written in 2007 and I call it a sane one. The other one was written almost as a satire or parody of all those who WORSHIP this book blindly as some kind of religious text. So here we go.
First Review (written in 2007)
Just as Christians love their Bible, Muslims their Koran; many Atheists, Rationalists, Entrepreneurs, Individualists love Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead. It is one of those books that changes the way you think or causes you to question your thoughts.
This novel is more loved for the political, philosophical message than the plot but in my opinion plot and story are superbly gripping. Howard Roark is one of a kind, his love story and odd courting, romance with Dominique is wild. But it’s not all love story, you will see how Rand ruthlessly conveys her agenda through this book that overshadows everything else in the novel.
All characters have their very interesting story: Toohey, the monstrous villain and the communist kind; Gail Wynand, the powerful tycoon who got it all but did he not give his soul in return?; Dominique, the sad, mad girl with a rich daddy, she is hopelessly in love with that man called Howard Roark who is the beginning and the end of this novel.
Yeah I’m giving you teasers only. I would be a damn fool to reveal the plot and spoil the wild fun and inspiration you’re bound to experience. In case you’re a people person or the one who likes to get along with everyone, you may feel nauseated with disgust.
Second long review which is also satirical was written about a year before the above one on May 9, 2006.
Fountainhead is a classic book in its own right. But as someone said in these reviews that you don’t have to buy a philosophy completely in order to like it. I love the ideas of Ayn Rand but I don’t buy them all like any ‘second hander’ would. For this reason my review contains criticism of Objectivism ( That has the tendency to become crypto- Nazism). It is just my opinion and I’m just using my freedom of expression for the sake of discussion as it is impossible for many to read Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged and not dream up political parties!
Ayn Rand’s brilliance shines and grips the reader from page 1. You’re wildly engrossed by the mystique of this young Howard Roark. You Wonder, What he’s upto? And you start your journey into the ideal of Individualism and the trend of the Crowd/ The herd/ The Collectivist/ The Second-hander.
Mind you, this book is dangerous in the sense you may end up buying more than you would like to bargain! Ayn Rand is hauntingly convincing. It hits your mind and the soul. It agitates, stimulates and provokes you to think… question… think again.
But I was delighted to read this book because I already held most of the ideals of the book very high in my heart and they were only confirmed as I read Fountainhead. It is exhilarating to discover that someone somewhere in this Universe not only shares your deepest thoughts but has profoundly manifested them in beautiful writing.
CRITICISM- Of course few months after the reading you will be able to shake off your initial mania ( If you passively buy Rand’s Objectivism) and you would see the holes in the philosophy of Objectivism. It is OK to disagree with Rand on some points as Objectivism requires us to be objective and listen to our OWN conscience/ Reason!
For start, why must one disbelieve the existence of God to subscribe to Objectivism/ Individualism? Objectivism and Atheism must come together, because God DOES NOT EXIST, so says the Objectivist. Hmmm.. No one has seen black holes either but many believe in their existence, same is true with the dark matter and many other phenomena etc.. I think Agnosticism (on the question of God) would not be too irrational, better still… let it be a matter of one’s conscience.
Second, I question Howard Roark’s morality and fairness. His first love- making with Dominique is a sort of consensual rape (???). Then he forgets her. Then he starts the sexual relationship again and continues it without any compunctions even when Dominique is married. Maybe he considers that the ethical issue regarding committing adultery is a religious diktat, a selfish, rational man is above that moral [...] ? I am not sure. I found it a behavior that undermines his integrity. It might sound harsh but for the sake of truth it is important to mention (in this review) that there is a very firm evidence that Ms. Rand herself carried on a long term/ intimate affair with much younger married man while she was still married to her husband. Both their spouses knew about it but were not allowed to interfere.
Same UNAPOLOGETIC/ NONCHALANT adultery is portrayed in Atlas Shrugged between Mr. Reardon (who is a married man with a beautiful, devout-mostly- wife) and Miss Taggart. I found their first sex act to be a very funny scene where Mr. Reardon declares he has always lusted after Miss Taggart and that he is a sex animal of some sort who would not mind giving up his every ambition, dream and industrial empire just to have Miss Taggart as his bonk buddy. What in the Dickens was that???? I still crack up when I think of that fall of superman and superwoman for a night of nookie. Hilarious and UNNOTICED BY Randmaniacs.
And what about Howard Roark being the poster boy for Cigarette companies. Our hero is a chain smoker of sorts and the picture is supposed to become romantic when Roark and Dominique smoke together. hmmmm… Why must a rational man smoke? Incidentally, Ms. Rand herself was a smoker and was diagnosed with lung cancer later in life…
Another small thing that kind of confuses me, is Ms. Rand’s consistent portrayal of THE IDEAL MAN or WOMAN as someone with Blond/ Red hair. What is with the hair colour? If only Anglo Saxon race is the ideal human race then rest of the planet is screwed and that’s a lot of screwed people stuck in eternal doom because they are not the right race. Ayn Rand happened to be Jewish to thicken the plot…
Coming back to the mind of Roark, I find, Roark’s most striking statement that contradicted all his other statements was his admission to Dominique, ”I LOVE YOU.” I found it so glaring an expression coming from him. Love and submission is exactly against his militant beliefs about his selfishness, ego. Love = sacrifing yourSELF to other Self, that is anti- Self. But anyhow, Roark lets Dominique be the sexual plaything for two other men (She even marries both of them!) One more inconsistency in his integrity.
His reverence, deep respect and submission to his mentor Architect in the beginning of the book is another notable example that shows Roark got a very soft, caring, humane and even EMOTIONAL nature. He is not cold, selfish and rational all times as the book seems to suggest in some parts.
Great Novel from a great author— But don’t get me wrong because of above points. I had to mention them as – though I absolutely love this book- I cannot understand why some poeple want to make religion out of couple of novels. It seems some sort of ‘Inerrancy of Ayn Rand, transliteration of Objectivism as personified in very entertaining novels’. It’s just too much hype and mawkishness really.
Such idol worship aside, DO READ Fountainhead whenever you get a chance. Most possibly, it will be one of the greatest AND VERY ENTERTAINING books you will ever read. This book has a great plot, very interesting characters; Toohey’s character has been developed terrifically. Even I was duped in the beginning of the book that Toohey was a good man! His character is an enigma really. Though he is the promoter of second handers he himself is a genius and a devilish manipulator. Rand presents him as a diabolical communist of sorts as she herself had strong hatred of communist ideology, mostly because of her experiences/impressions of Soviet Union.
And surely, there is a great inspirational theme that boils down to: BE YOURSELF/ NEVER IMITATE other human beings/ NEVER BORROW SOMEONE ELSE’S IDEAS/ NEVER SEEK ACCEPTANCE OF YOUR THOUGHTS OR ACTIONS… in words of Rand There is absolutely no need to SACRIFICE SELF TO OTHERS AND VICE VERSA. And if you manage to do EXACTLY all that you might be Tarzan in Brazilian rainforest.. hang on… it got to be Sweedish woods because otherwise there is a chance of getting the race wrong…
A CLASSIC- But as some reviewer (maybe on Atlas Shrugged page) said we don’t have to fully buy a philosophy in order to appreciate it, very much unlike religious texts. And philosophy aside, I found this book very enjoyable, gripping, suspenceful, profoundly inspiring and stimulating. It’s a great read for sure. Certainly in my top 10 list. Despite above critism I love the book because it is so beautiful and so unique. Dialogs between Characters can be very profound, really meaningful and thought provoking. Fountainhead is the sort of book you have to read several times and question your existence and that of this world.
Recent Comments